[tw: rape, murder, ableism] FEMINISM REJECTED ME: No matter what I do or where I go, someone has to mention that we should all take a moment to feel bad for **mothers** who want to murder their disabled children
and sociopathic asshats like Lisa Wade who feel the PRESSING FEMINIST ISSUE is sticking up for mothers who murder their disabled children
NOT DISABLED WOMEN, WHO IF THEY MAKE IT TO ADULTHOOD WITHOUT BEING MURDERED, ENDURE A RATE OF VIOLENCE, RAPE, AND ABUSE THAT IS FUCKING UNREAL.
70%-83% of developmentally disabled women have been, are, or will be raped.
Countless women with disabilities have been, are or will be forcibly sterilized in order to conceal evidence of their current or future rape. INCLUDING SMALL CHILDREN.
Countless women with disabilities are pressured to abort their pregnancies or given misinformation about their ability to have children.
Countless women have been denied basic accessibility tools in order to report their abuse or rape.
Women with disabilities who live in institutions are up to ten times more likely to be abused than women without disabilities.
Shit like this is why Linda Cornelison, a 19-year old woman, was tortured to death by medical staff at the Judge Rotenburg Center, receiving more than 57 applications of “aversives” in the last four hours preceding her death from a perforated ulcer, such as bruising muscle pinches and ammonia pellets broken directly under her nose. NO ONE WAS HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR HER DEATH.
This misplaced “sympathy” is why children like 3-year-old Amelia Rivera are denied lifesaving organ transplants and doctors fell comfortable telling their parents their lives aren’t worth saving.
“FEMINISTS” LIKE THESE ARE MORE CONCERNED ABOUT SYMPATHY FOR WENDY GARLAND’S MURDERERS THAN HER. More concerned about the two women who let her die covered in her own filth in a room over 100 degrees, where she lay bedridden and without medical attention for more than two years.
The media is more concerned about DOMESTIC ABUSER’S STRESS LEVEL then the fact that they’re BEATING THE SHIT OUT OF THEIR WIVES.
When 87% of women with severe disabilities are beaten by their partners, they are told they should “just leave”.
When young disabled women are burned to death by their mother, Lisa Wade asks, but what about that poor murderer???
And THE FUCKING MEDIA LOVES stories like this one that tell a sympathetic tale of a “poor mother” who drowned her disabled 4-year-old daughter in the bathtub, who has been released and plans to have more children, and has been ruled “not a threat” to children.
Laura Cummings, raped and tortured to death by her mother and other family members, and Lisa Wade would like us to sympathize with these “poor mothers”.
Zahra Baker, a disabled 10-year-old girl, was raped, murdered, dismembered and fed to wild animals, and Elisa Baker, her stepmother, was sentenced to 15-18 years for second degree murder…SHE FACES MORE TIME ON UNRELATED DRUG CHARGES THAN SHE DOES FOR THE MURDER. Her father received a 30-day suspended sentence for unrelated misdemeanors.
Betty Ann Gagnon, 48, lived most of her life on her own until she was beaten to death by her family after spending the previous FIVE YEARS IN A CHICKEN WIRE CAGE AND TENT SMEARED WITH HER OWN FECES. HER FAMILY WAS *NOT* CHARGED WITH MURDER.
THESE ARE NOT ISOLATED EVENTS.
THIS IS SYSTEMATIC VIOLENCE IN A WORLD THAT TELLS PEOPLE IT’S A-OK TO TORTURE, RAPE, AND MURDER DISABLED WOMEN AND ACTIVELY FACILITATES THEIR ABUSE, RAPE, AND MURDER.
“FEMINISTS” WHO DON’T UNDERSTAND THAT PRO-CHOICE WORKS BOTH WAYS
WHY WOULD I SUPPORT A MOVEMENT THAT WOULD BE GLAD TO SEE ME DEAD?
Amazing response.
NPR’s Linda Holmes reviews Twilight Breaking Dawn, Pt. 1 (via diandrabird)
Well doesn’t this leave me torn - I totally agree young girls might easily get the wrong ideas from such scenes - especially if they have parents who won’t talk honestly about sex.
But maybe this could be worded better?
I get so weary of the idea that rough, even brutal, sex is automatically abusive.
Fuck here I am defending Twilight. Smmfh.
(via bluntlyblue)
“she understands he couldn’t help it” is the bit that’s really problematic. Nothing wrong with rough/kinky/what have you sex, but the idea that a man is allowed to do it because he can’t help it, rather than because he’s discussed it with his partner and they’ve both agreed and consented, is fundamentally icky.
(via politeyeti)
Here’s what I posted on facebook when this came up:
I think that the issue isn’t rough sex so much as it being the culmination of a relationship based a stalking, predatory and controlling behavior (which was non-consensual) and so forth. It poses the woman as necessarily fragile, as necessarily damageable, rather than consensually/potentially damageable. While the sex itself- and the bruises and scars- was consensual, it was preceded in the previous books by munipulative and “red flag” behavior. In the first book in the series, Edward watches her sleep *without her knowledge*. Throughout the series, he manipulates her away from her only other close friend. He Manipulates her away from her family as well, though intention is unclear.
To me, it is all these things before this point that makes the sex scene… well, unsettling. I’m all for people enjoying consensual rough sex, and kinky sex, and no sex if that’s their thing. But when the entire relationship is based on stalker and munipulative behavior from the start, I do have to ask questions- more so because this is in mainstream, non-kinky lit, aimed towards teen girls who perhaps ought to be more aware of the warning signs that earlier in the series are prolific.
That said, anyone trying to use Twilight as an example of how rough/kinky sex is “bad” or dangerous can go STFU. Seriously. If someone consensually likes being bruised or scarred in private it is no one else’s business. (Though that person should think when sharing with others so that they don’t trigger people for whom it was non-consensual.)
she cannot see her heelprint upon another woman’s face?
What woman’s terms of oppression have become precious
and necessary to her as a ticket into the fold of the righteous,
away from the cold winds of self-scrutiny? … We welcome all
women who can meet us, face to face, beyond objectification
and beyond guilt. Audre Lorde (via darkjez)
Email Submission: J
[trigger warning: ableism]
When I started college this year, I was excited to finally be able to participate in activism outside of the Internet. I RSVP’d for the first meeting of the campus feminist organization as soon as they sent out an email. The president seemed very eager to welcome me since only a few freshman had responded at all. This changed when I wheeled myself into the meeting room. Everyone stared at me sitting there in my wheelchair as I introduced myself.
I explained how excited I was to be there and the group seemed to warm up to me…except for the president. She made a big show of me being there saying “See? Feminism is for everybody!” and kept asking me if I needed assistance with anything. I was fine with that, until she was at the snack table whispering to another colleague about how I should have told her I was a cripple and how she was so embarrassed.
I didn’t really think anything of it. I’ve grown accustomed to these kinds of things and everyone else seemed to like me a lot (I made a good number of friends that night). When the next meeting rolled around, I noticed that the president had moved the room to another building: a building that didn’t have a wheelchair ramp and wasn’t accessible to me. I emailed her and asked her if accommodations could be made but she did not reply. I had to get other members of the club to help me into and out of the building.
I asked her if she had gotten my email and she flashed a smile, she must have missed it! I let it go. I never want to be a bother for anyone and there wasn’t any point in starting drama. I asked her if we could meet in a building that would be more accessible for me and she told me that it wouldn’t be a problem. They’d be happy to do anything that would let me participate.
The next week rolled around and she was having the meeting in the same building. I sent her a confused email asking if she had forgotten her promise. The next day, one of my new friends told me that the president had said that she didn’t want me at the meetings anymore. I was an embarrassment and a shame. I ‘freaked’ her out too much. My friend was supposed to ask me to not come back. This new friend saw me cry for the first time since I began college. She held me and told me it would be okay, that not everyone is like that. She told me to forget about the other girl and suggested we make our own group.
I think we’re going to.
http://tal9000.tumblr.com/post/10540658345
In 1808, Napoleon, running out of scenic holiday destinations to invade, somehow totally forgot about his neighbor to the south, Spain. So that year he dispatched his troops, kicking off the Peninsular War.
Only 20 years old and working as a barmaid in the town of Valdepenas, Juana Galan was not expecting a surge of French soldiers to come storming through her village. But on June 6, that’s exactly what happened. At that time, most of the men were fighting Napoleon’s forces elsewhere in the nation. Juana, unfazed by things like rifles and Frenchmen and French riflemen, began organizing the women in her village to form a trap for the approaching army.
When the army arrived, Juana and her friends were ready. They dumped boiling water and oil on the French troops, which by all accounts will instantly take the fight out of pretty much anyone. Then Juana, armed with only a batan, beat back the heavily armed French cavalry with her squad of village women, almost none of whom were armed with guns.
The French retreated, giving up on capturing not just Juana’s town but the entire province of La Mancha, leading to ultimate Spanish victory. Today, she is seen in Spain as a national hero, a symbol of resistance, strength, patriotism, feminism and hitting shit with a stick.
(x)
oh my god i read about her yesterday
simply the most badass chick ever
Someone was once talking about how a certain committee needed someone on it who would hit people with sticks. Then everyone looked at me and suggested I join.
This is my new role model
(Source: lady-eboshi)
Maria Bamford, “How to WIN!” (via ammrva)
yes
(via brazenbitch)
(Source: yrwelcome)
(Source: raccoonwounds)
[img: a light-skinned person wearing a light pink shirt that reads “FUGLY SLUT” in white letters, black shorts, and tube socks. they are holding a neon pink sign that says “EVEN VOLDEMORT THINKS RAPE CULTURE IS EVIL” in black letters.]
hey, its me! major thanks to the person who posted this!
oh hay, this is my zine co-editor/roommate!
this is ONE OF THE MOST AWESOME PEOPLE I KNOW ON TUMBLR!!
(Source: slutwatpizzabutt)
Call for submissions for stitches: a critical dialogue with queer/dyke culture
Cis white lesbians do not own dyke or queer women’s culture. This is about rejecting transphobic pseudo-radical feminist discourse. Let’s imagine what a truly radical inclusive queer dyke culture could look like. Submissions can take any form. Rants, raves, poems, personal anecdotes, essays, song lyrics, drawings, collages etc. are all welcome.
Some topic ideas:
- What is queer? What is dyke? Are you one, both or neither? Transmisogyny, how have you experienced or witnessed it, how can we fight it and stand in solidarity against it?
- Racism in queer/dyke spaces, tokenization of women of color
- Bi/queerphobia in dyke communities, busted ideas about lesbian “purity” and “gold star” status, how can we change or resist them
- Words like womyn, grrrl and persyn; are they necessary any more?
- Butch/femme, how CAFAB masculinity is privileged, queer femme invisibility, passing
- Desires. How do you fuck? How do your sexuality and gender intersect?
- Violence and rape in queer/dyke communities, survivor experiences
- Queer/trans-positive anarcha-feminism; state or police violence
- How economic inequality, reproductive injustice, health care and employment discrimination, street harassment etc. affects queers, dykes, trans and cis women all together
- Women’s space in general: useful or irrelevant? can they exist without erasing non-binary folx, intersex folx, women of color or non-lesbians? Punk culture and/or riot grrrl?
- Best practices for allies – listening, honoring anger, taking responsibility
- Open letters: what do you need from queers, dykes and/or women?
Why is this zine called Stitches?: To stitch is to mend. Think about stitching up a wound. It requires the painful puncture of a needle, reunion and gradual healing of torn flesh. This is an analogy for a process that queer/dyke communities need to go through. We need tough conversations. We need to abandon inaccurate ideas.
Who can submit: Open to all! I strive to center POC, trans women, non-binary people, intersex people, and people with disabilities.
Why am I doing this: I’m a genderqueer butch dyke grrrl who has been told that I can’t be dyke because I’m fat, non-binary, queer-not-lesbian, engaged to a CAMAB person and kinky. I’m also sick of queers dumping on trans women. I don’t think that it is always their job to fight transmisogyny. Cis women and CAFAB people need to call each other’s bullshit and listen to trans women if we are ever going to get anywhere.
Format: 8 1/2 x 7” (recycled legal paper folded in half), b&w pages with color cover, staple bound. I’m aiming for 12-16 pages for the first issue.
Deadline: November 6, 2011.
Contact or send submissions to: punktreerecord@gmail.com
[posted by Arsenic Alyss on We Make Zines]
The Queer, Feminist & Trans Politics of Prison Abolition
A resource package developed by folks in the UK working around trans and queer prisoner support, some basic prison terms, and how to build stronger networks of prisoner support.
(Source: prisonercorrespondenceproject.com)
If only out of vanity
I have wondered what kind of woman I will be
when I am well past the summer of my raging youth
Will I still be raising revolutionary flags
and making impassioned speeches
that stir up anger in the hearts of pseudo-liberals
dressed in navy-blue conservative wear
In those years when I am grateful
I still have a good sturdy bladder
that does not leak undigested prune juice
onto diapers—no longer adorable
will I be more grateful for that
than for any forward movement in any current political cause
and will it have been worth it then
Will it have been worth the long hours
of not sleeping
that produced little more than reams
of badly written verses that catapulted me into literary spasms
but did not even whet the appetite
of the three O’ clock crowd
in the least respected of the New York poetry cafes
Will I wish then that I had taken that job working at the bank
or the one to watch that old lady drool
all over her soft boiled eggs
as she tells me how she was a raving beauty in the sixties
how she could have had any man she wanted
but she chose the one least likely to succeed
and that’s why when the son of a bitch died
she had to move into this place
because it was government subsidized
Will I tell my young attendant
how slender I was then
and paint for her pictures
of the young me more beautiful than I ever was
if only to make her forget the shriveled paper skin
the stained but even dental plates
and the faint smell of urine that tends to linger
in places built especially for revolutionaries
whose causes have been won
or forgotten
Will I still be lesbian then
or will the church or family finally convince me
to marry some man with a smaller dick
than the one my woman uses to afford me
violent and multiple orgasms
Will the staff smile at me
humor my eccentricities to my face
but laugh at me in their private resting rooms
saying she must have been something in her day
Most days I don’t know what I will be like then
but everyday—I know what I want to be now
I want to be that voice that makes Guilani
so scared he hires two (butch) black bodyguards
I want to write the poem
that The New York Times cannot print
because it might start some kind of black or lesbian
or even a white revolution
I want to go to secret meetings and under the guise
of female friendship I want to bed the women
of those young and eager revolutionaries
with too much zeal for their cause
and too little passion for the women
who follow them from city to city
all the while waiting in separate rooms
I want to be forty years old
and weigh three hundred pounds
and ride a motorcycle in the wintertime
with four hell raising children
and a one hundred ten pound female lover
who writes poetry about my life
and my children and loves me
like no one has ever loved me before
I want to be the girl your parents will use
as a bad example of a lady
I want to be the dyke who likes to fuck men
I want to be the politician who never lies
I want to be the girl who never cries
I want to go down in history
in a chapter marked miscellaneous
because the writers could find
no other way to categorize me
In this world where classification is key
I want to erase the straight lines
So I can be me
You can just… — Feministe (via lemdi)
It’s kind of sad that wanting people, regardless of their financial situation, to be able to enjoy life in some small way opens yourself up to being called a communist. Not that it is really an insult, it’s just sad that being decent is such an anomaly.
(via liquidiousfleshbag)
I will not look at a Feministe food thread. I will not look at a Feministe food thread. I will not—*clicks* GOD DAMN IT
(via wildunicornherd)the myth of the perfect 1950’s woman
While in the middle of an anti-sexism reflective essay, I can’t help but sound sexist.
I am a feminist also, so hear me out.
Women in the 50’s CARED about how they looked, they were well presented, classy and had pride in themselves. They put a face of make up on (which I am not saying is essential) and they cared about their figure. Sure they had more time than most women do in this day and age. What I am saying is that majority of women I see (take note I live in logan) don’t have any pride or care in themselves anymore. I applaud feminist movements and all that but why must we be rough about it? You can follow any trend you want, but do it properly? Oh man. I have dug myself a hole.
**edit: women were actually taught how to take care of everything.
Hopefully you don’t take this the wrong way. I just think “what is the point of living if you can’t even take care of your insides and outsides??”
I get what you’re saying but as a feminist I think you can begin a further critique of these subjects, assuming you actually want to push further in your examination of sexism etc. As another blogger pointed out, think about what you’re really picturing in your head. I’m guessing you weren’t alive in the 1950’s- neither was I. So what is your “ideal world” based off of? Tv shows and movies from that time period, or shows and movies now made to replicate that time period?
Our american collective memory has only remembered in all these things, the story of the middle-class, white american family. Not all women and men lived like this. Those tv shows and well known photos aren’t an accurate reflection of the average American life. Most women didn’t wear immaculate makeup everyday. Sure, they might have been more dressy, but my own mother still remembers when they (the girls) were first allowed to wear pants to school. Not even jeans: just pants. We tend to associate skirts and dresses with being “more classy/dressy” because they are more traditionally feminine, it may seem like these women were perhaps “more classy,” but really their choices were just more constricted.
And to say, as people often lament, that women suddenly started going to work just this century is one of the biggest myths we have fallen into believing. Only in the middle and upper class was this true- women in the lower class/near or at poverty were already working from the time they were teenagers. But their stories are forgotten because they are either not white, or weren’t upper or middle class.
“Women in the 50’s CARED about how they looked” Women today still care, they just are more likely to care in the sense that they dress more to please themselves rather than just look pleasing to other people. Why is your mind telling you that women don’t care enough about how they look now/should spend a lot more time caring about how they look to other people?
“And they cared about their figure.” This feels like body policing. Turn on the tv- switch to any channel whose demographic is adult (like, not Disney etc). Count how many diet commercials you will observe within a single half hour, and then try to tell me that women today don’t care/aren’t worried about their figure. And don’t forget, as a feminist, to examine intersecting privileges here; there is often a direct correlation between poverty and the ability to maintain a healthy diet.
I don’t really think that a welcome is enough, to be frank.
Feminism has a long long long history of cissexism and transphobia. Cissupremacy was at one point central to feminism. Second-wave feminists like Mary Daly, Andrea Dworkin, and yes, even Gloria Stienem (though she’s gotten better I believe) actively worked to exclude trans women from woman-only spaces - which meant life or death when you’re talking about rape crisis and domestic violence survivor shelters. Trans women, who face a MUCH higher rate of gendered violence than cis wome
This legacy has created a cis-centric feminism in which trans women are dehumanized and excluded to this very day and in which cis women like me participate. Trans women still face extremely high rates of violence, and like all marginalized women their safety is still not considered a priority the way, say, abortion is.
We should not expect trans women to just join us because we waved and asked nicely, to trust a group that has contributed to violence against them, because we finally acknowledged that they are women. We’ve got to do more than just welcome women in, than deign to finally do something we should have been doing all along (I don’t think this is totally SHIC’s point of view, btw - she may share these views, it just got me thinking).
Cis feminists need to do more than just welcome. We need to repair feminism: to centralize trans women on a consistent basis, to take their violence and degradation as seriously as we do our own.
rachel mccarthy james, emphasis pronoun (via transfeminism, sluthaditcoming) (via hairyqueerkid) (via combat—wombat) (via navigatethestream)One Thursday last month, during the lunch hour at H.D. Woodson Senior High School, half a dozen teenage boys have gathered to eat pizza and talk about hollering at women. “From where I come from, you holler at a girl,” one student tells the group. “A girl can’t be too upset when a guy is paying attention to her.” “It depends on the type of girl and whether she has respect for herself,” another says. “Some girls will say, stop. But they like it, for real.” “If she’s wearing short shorts, booty shorts, short skirt, with the thong showing, she wants it,” another guy says. “Can’t blame it on the boy. She knows what she’s doing.
“But what if it’s hot out?” This is Kedrick Griffin. He’s here to play the 37-year-old devil’s advocate on a subject that’s generally considered normal behavior for a teenage boy in the District of Columbia. This exercise has come almost at the end of a year-long District program called the “Men of Strength” club—MOST Club, for short. The same pattern is repeated with groups of boys in public middle and high schools across the District: Come for the pizza, stay for the deconstructions of masculinity.
I can’t even begin to express how much I love this.
it is so so so important that people are doing this. i’m grateful to all programs like this.
I’m so glad this is happening
(Source: professorpinka)

